Open menuReviews our check found reportable, with the text and the click path for each platform. You report them yourself in your own account; we then keep checking whether they disappear.
“Nice bread, but the floor and tables were messy at closing time.”
Our check
Not reportable: the review describes a real visit and criticises cleanliness. Reply and say what you are changing.
Genuine opinion or no clear rule broken. Reply publicly instead.
“Queue out the door on Saturday, waited 25 minutes for two croissants.”
Our check
Not reportable: the review describes a specific visit with a long wait. Reply calmly and say what you are doing about the queues.
Genuine opinion or no clear rule broken. Reply publicly instead.
“Worst bakery in Manchester, the staff are idiots and the owner is a crook.”
Our check · Potential policy violation identified · Insult or abusive language
The review insults the staff and the owner and describes no visit or purchase. Insults without a described experience break the platform’s rules.
Review the explanation before reporting. This is an automated assessment, not a prediction that the platform will remove the review.
Google removes reviews that break its content policy, not reviews you simply disagree with. Our check found: Insult or abusive language.
Ready to paste
I am asking Google to review this review of Sample Bakery (Manchester). The review calls our staff “idiots” and the owner “a crook” and does not describe any visit or purchase. It consists of insults rather than a description of an experience, which Google’s policy does not allow. We welcome honest feedback, including criticism. Please check this review against your policy and remove it if it does not meet it.
VOQX provides general information about platform reporting and appeal procedures. It does not assess your individual legal rights or provide legal representation. If a report is declined, consult the platform’s published appeal procedure; additional legal remedies depend on the facts and applicable law.
“Haven’t been, but my friend said it’s overpriced. One star.”
Our check · Potential policy violation identified · No customer experience recognisable
The author has not visited and only repeats what a friend said. A review must be based on the author’s own experience.
Review the explanation before reporting. This is an automated assessment, not a prediction that the platform will remove the review.
Google removes reviews that break its content policy, not reviews you simply disagree with. Our check found: No customer experience recognisable.
Ready to paste
I am asking Google to review this review of Sample Bakery (London). The author writes: “Haven’t been, but my friend said it’s overpriced.” The review is therefore based on hearsay, not on the author’s own experience with our business, which Google’s policy for reviews requires. We welcome honest feedback from real customers, including criticism. Please check this review against your policy and remove it if it does not meet it.
VOQX provides general information about platform reporting and appeal procedures. It does not assess your individual legal rights or provide legal representation. If a report is declined, consult the platform’s published appeal procedure; additional legal remedies depend on the facts and applicable law.
“Terrible pizza and the delivery driver was rude. Never ordering again.”
Our check · Potential policy violation identified · About a different business
The review is about pizza and a delivery driver. This bakery sells no pizza and does not deliver, so the review appears to be about a different business.
Review the explanation before reporting. This is an automated assessment, not a prediction that the platform will remove the review.
The report text for this review
I am asking Google to review this review of Sample Bakery (Leeds). The review is about a pizza and a delivery driver. Our bakery does not sell pizza and does not offer delivery, so the review appears to be about a different business. Please check this review against your policy and remove it if it does not meet it.
Reported on 21 Sept 2026. We keep checking whether it is still visible.
“Paid for a gift box and never received it, no answer to my emails for two weeks.”
Our check
Not reportable: the review describes a specific order and a delivery problem. Reply, apologise and offer a solution.
Genuine opinion or no clear rule broken. Reply publicly instead.
“Prices went up again – £4.50 for a cinnamon bun is too much.”
Our check
Not reportable: an opinion about prices is allowed. Reply politely and explain what customers get for the price.
Genuine opinion or no clear rule broken. Reply publicly instead.
“Staff member Tom R. lives at 4 Sample Lane – everyone should know who served me.”
Our check · Potential policy violation identified · Personal data of third parties
The review names an employee and publishes a private address. Personal data of third parties is not allowed.
Review the explanation before reporting. This is an automated assessment, not a prediction that the platform will remove the review.
Removed on 25 Sept 2026.
“Former employee here. Management is terrible, don’t buy here.”
Our check · Borderline case – review carefully · Conflict of interest (competitor, employee, paid)
The author says they are a former employee and writes about management, not about a purchase. A conflict of interest is possible but not certain – decide yourself.
Possibly reportable. Read the reasoning and decide yourself.
Review the explanation before reporting. This is an automated assessment, not a prediction that the platform will remove the review.
Trustpilot only removes reviews that break its guidelines; genuine negative experiences stay. Our check found: Conflict of interest (competitor, employee, paid).
Ready to paste
I am asking Trustpilot to review this review of Sample Bakery. The author describes themselves as a former employee and writes about internal management, not about buying from us. This suggests a conflict of interest. Please check this review against your guidelines and remove it if it does not meet them.
VOQX provides general information about platform reporting and appeal procedures. It does not assess your individual legal rights or provide legal representation. If a report is declined, consult the platform’s published appeal procedure; additional legal remedies depend on the facts and applicable law.
“Lovely pastries but quite pricey for tourists.”
Our check
Not reportable: an opinion about prices is allowed. Reply politely and explain what customers get for the price.
Genuine opinion or no clear rule broken. Reply publicly instead.
“Tasty food, but the tables were sticky and nobody cleared them.”
Our check
Not reportable: the review describes a real visit and criticises cleanliness. Reply and say what you are changing.
Genuine opinion or no clear rule broken. Reply publicly instead.
